<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>adventures of a blogjunkie &#187; internet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogjunkie.net/tag/internet/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogjunkie.net</link>
	<description>thoughts and ramblings of David Wang</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 04:21:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>[RANT] Why I stopped trusting Google</title>
		<link>http://blogjunkie.net/2010/08/why-i-stopped-trusting-google?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=why-i-stopped-trusting-google</link>
		<comments>http://blogjunkie.net/2010/08/why-i-stopped-trusting-google#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2010 04:55:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>blogjunkie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rants]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogjunkie.net/?p=835</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lately I&#8217;ve been telling many of my friends to be very careful about Facebook because they don&#8217;t take our privacy seriously. This past week another company joins that list &#8211; Google. In addition to privacy, their business practices also make me highly suspicious of them. Google&#8217;s recent actions have made me stop trusting them. I...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-836" title="Google Logo" src="http://blogjunkie.net/media/2010/08/google_logo-e1281761692632.jpg" alt="" width="450" height="200" /></p>
<p>Lately I&#8217;ve been telling many of my friends to be very careful about Facebook because they don&#8217;t take our privacy seriously. This past week another company joins that list &#8211; Google. In addition to privacy, their business practices also make me highly suspicious of them.</p>
<p>Google&#8217;s recent actions have made me stop trusting them. I admit, these are very geek reasons that many of my friends won&#8217;t understand, but they&#8217;ve made me seriously reconsider my relationship to Google and how much I should support them.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the short version. They&#8217;re a great company but they hide behind their unoficial motto of &#8220;Don&#8217;t be evil&#8221; when they are clearly happy to be a little evil. I hate it that they&#8217;re two-faced, because I can&#8217;t trust people that are two-faced.</p>
<p>So now, if you&#8217;ve got a little time to listen to me rant, here&#8217;s why I stopped trusting Google:</p>
<h3>Privacy</h3>
<h4>1. Google CEO Eric Schmidt dismisses privacy</h4>
<p><object width="500" height="400"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/A6e7wfDHzew?fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/A6e7wfDHzew?fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="500" height="400" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>&#8220;If you have something that you don&#8217;t want anyone to know, maybe you shouldn&#8217;t be doing it in the first place,&#8221; said Eric Schmidt.</p>
<p>After recently reading <a href="http://craphound.com/littlebrother/">Cory Doctorow&#8217;s Little Brother</a>, I&#8217;ve got a new appreciation of the importance of privacy and it makes me very concerned that the company that handles my email, calendar, search and more seems so unconcerned about privacy.<br />
<span id="more-835"></span></p>
<p>I highly encourage reading EFF&#8217;s editorial on this: <a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/12/google-ceo-eric-schmidt-dismisses-privacy">Google CEO Eric Schmidt Dismisses the Importance of Privacy</a>. Here&#8217;s a great quote:</p>
<blockquote><p>Google, governments, and technologists need to understand more broadly that ignoring privacy protections in the innovations we incorporate into our lives not only invites invasions of our personal space and comfort, but opens the door to future abuses of power.</p></blockquote>
<h4>2. So many privacy &#8220;blunders&#8221;.. maybe they&#8217;re intentional?</h4>
<p>Google does not have a good track record when it comes to handling our private information:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-31322_3-10451428-256.html">Molly Wood: Google Buzz privacy</a></li>
<li><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2010/03/google-keeps-your-data-to-learn-from-good-guys-fight-off-bad-guys.ars">Why Google keeps your data forever, tracks you with ads</a></li>
<li><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/8632517.stm">BBC: Google rapped over privacy by 10 nations<br />
</a></li>
</ul>
<p>In the last link, a watchdog group sent an open letter to Google. Here&#8217;s a quote from the letter:</p>
<blockquote><p>Launching a product in &#8216;beta&#8217; form is not a substitute for ensuring that new services comply with fair information principles before they are introduced</p></blockquote>
<h3>Business Practices</h3>
<p>Google was probably my 2nd favourite company after Apple. However, I began to lose my adoration of them once they started competing directly with Apple in the phone space.</p>
<h4>3. Google copies iPhone design</h4>
<p>Google announced their Android project a long time ago. At that time Eric Schmidt was a member of the Apple board. After Apple introduced the iPhone, <a href="http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2010/07/09/larry-page-jobs-is-rewriting-history/">Google changed it&#8217;s direction for Android</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>According to a former Apple employee, the day that the Apple-Google relationship started to crumble was the introduction of the T-Mobile G1.  According to him, Steve Jobs and Apple Mobile Software VP Scott Forstall had only seen Android prototypes that looked like Blackberries.  The new form factor was &#8220;way too similar to the iPhone for Jobs&#8217; tastes&#8221;.</p></blockquote>
<p>Sure, there&#8217;s no direct evidence of Google stealing Apple&#8217;s ideas, but I think it&#8217;s pretty obvious. Google has terrible design sense, and their phone OS suddenly gets lots of similar features to the iPhone. All the while, <a href="http://kara.allthingsd.com/20100521/viral-video-googles-laughable-but-not-funny-apple-tantrum/?mod=ATD_rss">they&#8217;re taking potshots at Apple</a>.</p>
<h4>4. Google sells internet users out under pretense of &#8216;better internet&#8217;</h4>
<p>Google and Verizon put together a proposal that they want the US Congress to ratify that would split the internet into the &#8220;public internet&#8221; and &#8220;better internets&#8221;. This would open the door to ISPs being able to charge you more money for premium content and services on the &#8220;better internets&#8221;.</p>
<p>On principle I hate the idea of a tiered internet. It should be open for everyone. But what really gets me is Google&#8217;s 180-degree turn of their stance on this tiered internet (net neutrality issue). Ars Technica put together a great <a href="http://arstechnica.com/telecom/news/2010/08/a-paper-trail-of-betrayal-googles-net-neutrality-collapse.ars">paper trail of betrayal: Google&#8217;s net neutrality collapse</a>.</p>
<p>Also read:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://io9.com/5610328/how-the-googleverizon-proposal-could-kill-the-internet-in-5-years">How the Google/Verizon proposal could kill the internet in 5 years</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2010/08/why-google-became-a-carrier-humping-net-neutrality-surrender-monkey/">Why Google Became A Carrier-Humping, Net Neutrality Surrender Monkey</a></li>
</ul>
<h3>Stop Being Two-Faced</h3>
<p>Ultimately what I have come to realise is that Google is just a super two-faced company. Like MG Siegler says, &#8220;<a href="http://techcrunch.com/2010/08/13/google-net-neutrality/">Google, Just Cut The BS And Give The Gordon Gekko Speech Already</a>&#8220;. Seriously.</p>
<p>Google, you were one of the good guys (or at least so I thought). I don&#8217;t mind you wanting to make money. I <em>want</em> you to make money so you can continue providing us great products.</p>
<p>But please don&#8217;t pretend to be the goody-two-shoes with your &#8220;Don&#8217;t be evil&#8221; mantra and then turn around and stab us in the back later. Because when you do that, people who don&#8217;t know better fall into your trap, and along the way you spoil what&#8217;s important to geeks like me.</p>
<p>And that&#8217;s why I&#8217;m so disappointed, and I can&#8217;t trust Google any more.</p>
<p><ins datetime="2010-08-30T04:44:04+00:00">Update</ins>: Another article from TechCrunch that captures what I&#8217;m feeling: <a href="http://techcrunch.com/2010/08/21/google-anakin-verizon-dark-side/">Google Is Anakin, Verizon Is The Emperor, And The Dark Side Is Winning</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogjunkie.net/2010/08/why-i-stopped-trusting-google/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Should the USA &#8216;protect&#8217; the internet?</title>
		<link>http://blogjunkie.net/2010/01/should-the-usa-protect-the-internet?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=should-the-usa-protect-the-internet</link>
		<comments>http://blogjunkie.net/2010/01/should-the-usa-protect-the-internet#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 07:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>blogjunkie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogjunkie.net/?p=610</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[2010 kicked off with a very interesting high-stakes drama unfolding between Google and China. The situation has now blown up and got the US government involved. Yesterday, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton made a speech on Internet Freedom which basically outlined a new foreign policy for USA and extended it to the internet. In a nutshell,...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2762/4293395736_b4dea432f0.jpg" alt="Secretary Clinton Delivers Remarks on Internet Freedom" width="500" height="375" /></p>
<p>2010 kicked off with a very interesting high-stakes drama unfolding between Google and China. The situation has now blown up and got the US government involved. Yesterday, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton made a speech on Internet Freedom which basically outlined a new foreign policy for USA and extended it to the internet.</p>
<p>In a nutshell, the US wants to help ensure the freedom of the internet to everyone, all over the world, especially in countries like Iran and China. Erick Schonfeld in Techcrunch says it best:</p>
<blockquote><p>Apparently, it is now the U.S. government’s foreign policy to protect and promote these freedoms throughout the information “commons” which extend beyond our physical borders.  It is also U.S. foreign policy to encourage corporations, particularly those in the technology industry, to protect these freedoms.</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;d highly encourage reading the Techcrunch article which does a great job of explaining Clinton&#8217;s speech &#8211; <a title="Hillary Clinton Extends Foreign Policy To The Internet And Wants Your Help" rel="bookmark" href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2010/01/21/internet-freedoms-clinton-foreign-policy/">Hillary Clinton Extends Foreign Policy To The Internet And Wants Your Help</a>. For background on how this all came about, check out CNET News&#8217; roundup (<a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-10433833-93.html?tag=mncol;txt">Google&#8217;s challenge in China</a>), especially this video that summarises everything - <a href="http://news.cnet.com/1606-2_3-50082324.html?tag=mncol;txt">Video: China&#8217;s attack on Google explained</a>.</p>
<h3>My Thoughts</h3>
<p>I&#8217;m really not a fan of politics and international relations. However this seems like a really big development that may impact the internet throughout the world, and not just in China and USA.</p>
<p>This also smacks of <em>USA being the world&#8217;s sherrif</em>, but I ask myself who else could or would even try to protect the internet. And on the other hand is China &#8211; the world&#8217;s largest country and possibly the most powerful &#8211; is censoring the media and the internet like nobody&#8217;s business. If our silly politicians here try to censor the internet we would be up in arms right?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure how I feel about this, but I definitely don&#8217;t want the internet to be censored or for there to be a Chinese internet and an English internet. What do you think?</p>
<p><em>Photo Credit: Flickr/ </em><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/statephotos/4293395736/"><em>U.S. State Dept</em></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogjunkie.net/2010/01/should-the-usa-protect-the-internet/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
