<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>adventures of a blogjunkie &#187; technology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogjunkie.net/tag/technology/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogjunkie.net</link>
	<description>thoughts and ramblings of David Wang</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 09:07:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Should the USA &#8216;protect&#8217; the internet?</title>
		<link>http://blogjunkie.net/2010/01/should-the-usa-protect-the-internet?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=should-the-usa-protect-the-internet</link>
		<comments>http://blogjunkie.net/2010/01/should-the-usa-protect-the-internet#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 07:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>blogjunkie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogjunkie.net/?p=610</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[2010 kicked off with a very interesting high-stakes drama unfolding between Google and China. The situation has now blown up and got the US government involved. Yesterday, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton made a speech on Internet Freedom which basically outlined a new foreign policy for USA and extended it to the internet. In a nutshell,...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2762/4293395736_b4dea432f0.jpg" alt="Secretary Clinton Delivers Remarks on Internet Freedom" width="500" height="375" /></p>
<p>2010 kicked off with a very interesting high-stakes drama unfolding between Google and China. The situation has now blown up and got the US government involved. Yesterday, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton made a speech on Internet Freedom which basically outlined a new foreign policy for USA and extended it to the internet.</p>
<p>In a nutshell, the US wants to help ensure the freedom of the internet to everyone, all over the world, especially in countries like Iran and China. Erick Schonfeld in Techcrunch says it best:</p>
<blockquote><p>Apparently, it is now the U.S. government’s foreign policy to protect and promote these freedoms throughout the information “commons” which extend beyond our physical borders.  It is also U.S. foreign policy to encourage corporations, particularly those in the technology industry, to protect these freedoms.</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;d highly encourage reading the Techcrunch article which does a great job of explaining Clinton&#8217;s speech &#8211; <a title="Hillary Clinton Extends Foreign Policy To The Internet And Wants Your Help" rel="bookmark" href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2010/01/21/internet-freedoms-clinton-foreign-policy/">Hillary Clinton Extends Foreign Policy To The Internet And Wants Your Help</a>. For background on how this all came about, check out CNET News&#8217; roundup (<a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-10433833-93.html?tag=mncol;txt">Google&#8217;s challenge in China</a>), especially this video that summarises everything - <a href="http://news.cnet.com/1606-2_3-50082324.html?tag=mncol;txt">Video: China&#8217;s attack on Google explained</a>.</p>
<h3>My Thoughts</h3>
<p>I&#8217;m really not a fan of politics and international relations. However this seems like a really big development that may impact the internet throughout the world, and not just in China and USA.</p>
<p>This also smacks of <em>USA being the world&#8217;s sherrif</em>, but I ask myself who else could or would even try to protect the internet. And on the other hand is China &#8211; the world&#8217;s largest country and possibly the most powerful &#8211; is censoring the media and the internet like nobody&#8217;s business. If our silly politicians here try to censor the internet we would be up in arms right?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure how I feel about this, but I definitely don&#8217;t want the internet to be censored or for there to be a Chinese internet and an English internet. What do you think?</p>
<p><em>Photo Credit: Flickr/ </em><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/statephotos/4293395736/"><em>U.S. State Dept</em></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogjunkie.net/2010/01/should-the-usa-protect-the-internet/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Searchable Flash</title>
		<link>http://blogjunkie.net/2008/07/searchable-flash?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=searchable-flash</link>
		<comments>http://blogjunkie.net/2008/07/searchable-flash#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 10:26:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>blogjunkie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Asides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogjunkie.net/?p=179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Adobe is making Flash searchable.. but only to Google and Yahoo. Link]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adobe is making Flash searchable.. but only to Google and Yahoo. <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-10784_3-9981616-7.html">Link</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogjunkie.net/2008/07/searchable-flash/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft unveils revamped Zunes</title>
		<link>http://blogjunkie.net/2007/10/microsoft-unveils-revamped-zunes?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=microsoft-unveils-revamped-zunes</link>
		<comments>http://blogjunkie.net/2007/10/microsoft-unveils-revamped-zunes#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 13:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>blogjunkie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Asides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogjunkie.net/2007/10/microsoft-unveils-revamped-zunes/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft unveils revamped Zunes &#124; CNET News.com The problem is that the newest Zune models don&#8217;t offer anything demonstrably better than the iPod What? Did you expect something original out of Microsoft?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.news.com/Microsoft-unveils-new-generation-of-Zune/2100-1041_3-6211357.html?part=rss&amp;tag=2547-1_3-0-5&amp;subj=news">Microsoft unveils revamped Zunes | CNET News.com</a></p>
<blockquote><p> The problem is that the newest Zune models don&#8217;t offer anything demonstrably better than the iPod</p></blockquote>
<p>What? Did you expect something original out of Microsoft?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogjunkie.net/2007/10/microsoft-unveils-revamped-zunes/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WindowsRG</title>
		<link>http://blogjunkie.net/2007/08/windowsrg?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=windowsrg</link>
		<comments>http://blogjunkie.net/2007/08/windowsrg#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 17:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>blogjunkie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Asides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[humour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogjunkie.net/2007/08/windowsrg/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FSJ points to a leaked copy of the next generation Windows operating system. It&#8217;s &#8220;Really Good&#8221;. Be sure to check out the online demo.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://fakesteve.blogspot.com/2007/08/next-gen-windows-leaked.html">FSJ points</a> to a leaked copy of the next generation Windows operating system. It&#8217;s &#8220;Really Good&#8221;. Be sure to check out the <a href="http://www.deanliou.com/WinRG/WinRG2.htm">online demo</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogjunkie.net/2007/08/windowsrg/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft is dead</title>
		<link>http://blogjunkie.net/2007/04/microsoft-is-dead?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=microsoft-is-dead</link>
		<comments>http://blogjunkie.net/2007/04/microsoft-is-dead#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2007 11:39:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>blogjunkie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Asides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogjunkie.net/2007/04/microsoft-is-dead/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft is dead, says Paul Graham. Microsoft&#8217;s biggest weakness is that they still don&#8217;t realize how much they suck. I love that line.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft is dead, says Paul Graham.</p>
<blockquote><p>Microsoft&#8217;s biggest weakness is that they still don&#8217;t realize how much they suck.</p></blockquote>
<p>I love that line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogjunkie.net/2007/04/microsoft-is-dead/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple Computer</title>
		<link>http://blogjunkie.net/2007/04/apple-computer?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=apple-computer</link>
		<comments>http://blogjunkie.net/2007/04/apple-computer#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2007 11:25:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>blogjunkie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Asides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogjunkie.net/2007/04/apple-computer/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jon Gruber tells us why Apple is more of a computer company than ever, despite dropping &#8216;Computer&#8217; from its name: This isnâ€™t a new direction for Apple. It&#8217;s the same path the company has been on all along. Cool new software powered by OS X, running on beautiful, well-designed hardware describes the iPhone and the...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jon Gruber tells us why Apple is more of a computer company than ever, despite dropping &#8216;Computer&#8217; from its name:</p>
<blockquote><p>This isnâ€™t a new direction for Apple. It&#8217;s the same path the company has been on all along. <em>Cool new software powered by OS X, running on beautiful, well-designed hardware</em> describes the iPhone and the Apple TV just as well as it does the Mac.</p></blockquote>
<p>From his first article as a contributor to Macworld &#8211; <a href="http://www.macworld.com/2007/03/opinion/aprilspotlight/index.php">Apple&#8217;s computer, incorporated</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogjunkie.net/2007/04/apple-computer/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TM revenue target</title>
		<link>http://blogjunkie.net/2007/03/tm-revenue-target?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=tm-revenue-target</link>
		<comments>http://blogjunkie.net/2007/03/tm-revenue-target#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 01:22:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>blogjunkie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Asides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malaysia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogjunkie.net/2007/03/tm-revenue-target/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Telekom Malaysia Bhd (TM) is aiming to achieve a revenue of RM18.1 billion this year, up 10.36% from RM16.4 billion last year. It said in a statement that revenue growth was expected to be largely driven by its international operations in Indonesia, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and its domestic mobile operations. (Source: The Edge). This follows...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.tm.com.my">Telekom Malaysia Bhd (TM)</a> is aiming to achieve a revenue of RM18.1 billion this year, up 10.36% from RM16.4 billion last year. It said in a statement that revenue growth was expected to be largely driven by its international operations in Indonesia, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and its domestic mobile operations. (<a href="http://www.theedgedaily.com/cms/content.jsp?id=com.tms.cms.article.Article_6a4c2d08-cb73c03a-15e0c2b0-6901a2ab">Source: The Edge</a>).</p>
<p>This follows a <a href="http://biz.thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2007/3/16/business/17161785&amp;sec=business">partnership agreement with Verizon Business</a> last week to build an IP hub in Cyberjaya, which will hopefully improve TM Streamyx&#8217;s performance.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m waiting to see how you do, TM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogjunkie.net/2007/03/tm-revenue-target/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ABI names top mobile operators</title>
		<link>http://blogjunkie.net/2007/03/abi-names-top-mobile-operators?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=abi-names-top-mobile-operators</link>
		<comments>http://blogjunkie.net/2007/03/abi-names-top-mobile-operators#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 03:39:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>blogjunkie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Asides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogjunkie.net/2007/03/abi-names-top-mobile-operators/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ABI Research has named Vodafone and NTT Docomo as the top mobile operators in the industry in a recent study, according to businessMOBILEAsia. ABI&#8217;s study revealed that both NTT Docomo and Vodafone were ahead of their peers in areas of consumer and enterprise application delivery, as well as mobile payment. ABI also singled out Hutchison...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ABI Research has named <a href="http://www.vodafone.com">Vodafone</a> and <a href="http://www.nttdocomo.com/">NTT Docomo</a> as the top mobile operators in the industry in a recent study, <a href="http://www.businessmobileasia.com/news/infrastructure/management/0,39061838,61997179,00.htm">according to businessMOBILEAsia</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>ABI&#8217;s study revealed that both NTT Docomo and Vodafone were ahead of their peers in areas of consumer and enterprise application delivery, as well as mobile payment.</p></blockquote>
<p>ABI also singled out <a href="http://www.three.co.uk">Hutchison 3</a> and <a href="http://www.chinamobile.com/">China Mobile</a> as operators with great long term potential.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogjunkie.net/2007/03/abi-names-top-mobile-operators/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Celcom March launch</title>
		<link>http://blogjunkie.net/2007/03/celcom-march-launch?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=celcom-march-launch</link>
		<comments>http://blogjunkie.net/2007/03/celcom-march-launch#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 01:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>blogjunkie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Asides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malaysia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogjunkie.net/2007/03/celcom-march-launch/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I spoke to one of Celcom&#8217;s Product Development managers last week and he revealed that Celcom was working on a project that will be unveiled at the end of the month. HSDPA perhaps? I&#8217;m guessing it will more likely be a major content deal since they&#8217;ve demonstrated great savvy in their recent marketing tie-ups. You...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I spoke to one of Celcom&#8217;s Product Development managers last week and he revealed that <a href="http://www.celcom.com.my">Celcom</a> was working on a project that will be unveiled at the end of the month. HSDPA perhaps? I&#8217;m guessing it will more likely be a major content deal since they&#8217;ve demonstrated great savvy in their recent marketing tie-ups.</p>
<p>You heard it here first <img src='http://blogjunkie.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogjunkie.net/2007/03/celcom-march-launch/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google phone</title>
		<link>http://blogjunkie.net/2007/03/google-phone?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=google-phone</link>
		<comments>http://blogjunkie.net/2007/03/google-phone#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2007 14:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>blogjunkie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Asides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogjunkie.net/2007/03/google-phone/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First the iPhone, now the Google Phone. The head of Google in Spain and Portugal has confirmed that Google is working on a mobile phone. Google HQ in the US responded with a statement that neither confirmed or denied the rumoured Blackberry-like Google Phone. The telecommunications landscape is starting to look very interesting&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First the iPhone, now the Google Phone. The head of Google in Spain and Portugal has <a href="http://news.com.com/2061-10812_3-6167826.html">confirmed that Google is working on a mobile phone</a>. Google HQ in the US responded with a statement that neither confirmed or denied the rumoured Blackberry-like Google Phone. The telecommunications landscape is starting to look very interesting&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogjunkie.net/2007/03/google-phone/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
